I apparently only got page 1 of 2 of my results. I'm not sure anything is on the second page.
So this is what I have:
tTg ANTIBODY, IgA 2.69 (<20 negative)
DGP ANTIBODY IgA 2.28 (<20 negative)
IgA 129 (says range 81-463, which I assume is normal?)
So is it the IgA that you have to have a certain level of to trust the other results? And according to this mine is high enough to be reliable?
Thanks!
Also here is the report from the biopsy:
microscopic description:
Sections of the duodenum show an appropriate villous to crypt ratio without increased intraepithelial lymphocytes. No microorganisms, metaplasia, dysplasia or carcinoma is identified.
gross description:
recieved in formalin... and consists of multiple/tan soft tissue fragments aggregating to .8x.6x.3. TE 1 block. EV, PA (ASPC)
So this is what I have:
tTg ANTIBODY, IgA 2.69 (<20 negative)
DGP ANTIBODY IgA 2.28 (<20 negative)
IgA 129 (says range 81-463, which I assume is normal?)
So is it the IgA that you have to have a certain level of to trust the other results? And according to this mine is high enough to be reliable?
Thanks!
Also here is the report from the biopsy:
microscopic description:
Sections of the duodenum show an appropriate villous to crypt ratio without increased intraepithelial lymphocytes. No microorganisms, metaplasia, dysplasia or carcinoma is identified.
gross description:
recieved in formalin... and consists of multiple/tan soft tissue fragments aggregating to .8x.6x.3. TE 1 block. EV, PA (ASPC)



.png)







